Mar 27, 2019 23:57
5 yrs ago
32 viewers *
Spanish term
Ampararse en un título
Spanish to English
Law/Patents
Law (general)
Un artículo de Ley Orgánica:
No se admitirán las peticiones cuyo objeto sea ajeno a las atribuciones de los poderes públicos, instituciones u organismos a que se dirijan, así como aquéllas cuya resolución deba ampararse en un título específico distinto al establecido en esta Ley que deba ser objeto de un procedimiento parlamentario, administrativo o de un proceso judicial.
No sé a qué hace referencia el "ampararse en un título". Cualquier ayuda será bien recibida.
Gracias!
Saludos
hfmg
No se admitirán las peticiones cuyo objeto sea ajeno a las atribuciones de los poderes públicos, instituciones u organismos a que se dirijan, así como aquéllas cuya resolución deba ampararse en un título específico distinto al establecido en esta Ley que deba ser objeto de un procedimiento parlamentario, administrativo o de un proceso judicial.
No sé a qué hace referencia el "ampararse en un título". Cualquier ayuda será bien recibida.
Gracias!
Saludos
hfmg
Proposed translations
(English)
Proposed translations
35 mins
Robert Carter
Mexico
Mexico
Native in English
Specializes in field
Mexico
Translating full-time since 1998
Native in: English (Variant: British) 
Works in: Spanish to English
Related KudoZ points
:
1372
Selected
covered by a title
It seems clear to me that "título" here refers to a "title", i.e., a division, of a statute. The ambiguous part, to my mind, is "ampararse".
Is it being used generically as in "protected" or "covered", or is it being used technically, as in "seek a writ of Amparo"? I'm not sure, but my sense is it's the former:
Artículo 14. No se admitirán las peticiones cuyo objeto no corresponda a las atribuciones de los poderes públicos de la Federación, así como aquéllas cuya resolución deba ampararse en un título específico distinto al establecido en esta Ley que deba ser objeto de un procedimiento legislativo, administrativo o de un proceso judicial.
http://gaceta.diputados.gob.mx/Black/Gaceta/Anteriores/61/20...
Is it being used generically as in "protected" or "covered", or is it being used technically, as in "seek a writ of Amparo"? I'm not sure, but my sense is it's the former:
Artículo 14. No se admitirán las peticiones cuyo objeto no corresponda a las atribuciones de los poderes públicos de la Federación, así como aquéllas cuya resolución deba ampararse en un título específico distinto al establecido en esta Ley que deba ser objeto de un procedimiento legislativo, administrativo o de un proceso judicial.
http://gaceta.diputados.gob.mx/Black/Gaceta/Anteriores/61/20...
Note from asker:
| Thanks Robert! I think this is the less risky choice. |
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "Thanks to everyone, but I can only give points to one of you, although you all deserve them!"
+1
42 mins
Meridy Lippoldt
United States
United States
Native in English
Specializes in field
United States
MSL Translation Services
Native in: English
Works in: French to English, Spanish to English, Italian to English, and 1 more.
Related KudoZ points
:
95
a decision which relies on a stated pretext other than what is set forth in...
Just a hunch.
Note from asker:
| Thank you Meridy! I agree that "rely" fits perfectly here! |
Peer comment(s):
| agree |
Wilsonn Perez Reyes
: "Rely" puede ser ampararse como en: rely on a clause (ampararse en una cláusula), según el ejemplo del diccionario de West, T. (2012).
33 mins
|
-1
1 hr
Juan Arturo Blackmore Zerón
Mexico
Mexico
Native in Spanish
Works in field
Mexico
Confianza, certeza, creatividad.
Native in: Spanish (Variant: Mexican)
Works in: English to Spanish, Italian to Spanish, French to Spanish, and 6 more.
Related KudoZ points
:
57
where solution is based on a specific fundament different to those the law prescribes
Those petitions... where solution is based on a specific fundament different to those the Law prescribes.
Note from asker:
| Yes, I went for "based on" too, but I think "rely on" fits better here. Thank you for your suggestion! |
Peer comment(s):
| disagree |
AllegroTrans
: totally unnatural English with a major error of grammar
9 hrs
|
13 hrs
Adrian MM.
Austria
Austria
Native in English
Specializes in field
Austria
Retd.T&I, Barrister & Austro-Advokat
Native in: English (Variants: British, Scottish) 
Works in: Spanish to English, English to Spanish, French to English, and 5 more.
Related KudoZ points
:
586
Find safe harbo(u)r in a chapter of an enactment
I concur *with* Robert C. *in* division of a statute as the Spanish Constitutional context (Constitución española > *Título I*. De los derechos y deberes) clearly refers to a part vs. single section of a statute and not a judg(e)ment (debt) etc, whilst methinks title - albeit a translational favourite - is not immediately captivating as a part of a legislative corpus.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 16 hrs (2019-03-28 16:05:30 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
e.g. be rooted in or predicated on a statutory authority - rather than based on a document.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 16 hrs (2019-03-28 16:05:30 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
e.g. be rooted in or predicated on a statutory authority - rather than based on a document.
Example sentence:
Inicio > Constitución española > *Título I*. De los derechos y deberes .... de peticiones aquellas "cuya resolución deba ampararse en un título específico
Note from asker:
| Thank you very much Adrian! intresting choice |
22 hrs
Nikolaj Widenmann
United States
United States
Native in English
Specializes in field
United States
Legalese and business speak, translated.
Native in: Danish , English
Works in: Danish to English, Norwegian to English, English to Danish, and 4 more.
Related KudoZ points
:
143
subject to a statute
Another suggestion, as in "those that are subject to a statute beyond the provisions of this Act..."
¡Suerte!
¡Suerte!
Something went wrong...