English term
contract chipmaker
Why isn't it just "the world's largest chipmaker"? What is a "contract chipmaker"?
Thank you!
Non-PRO (1): Yvonne Gallagher
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Responses
manufacturer of (semiconductor) chips under contract
neutral |
Daryo
: you forgot the link to your ref. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TSMC
In fact most of this quote is not about being "contract chipmaker", so if don't know already where is the "nuance" you would be left none the wiser ... WHICH WAS THE QUESTION!!!
2 hrs
|
Asker is in USA and I expect she can work out what "under contract" means
|
|
agree |
philgoddard
3 hrs
|
thanks
|
|
agree |
Sajad Neisi
7 hrs
|
thanks
|
|
agree |
Yvonne Gallagher
: Don't see the problem. This is simple English. No need to spell out what "under contract" means
8 hrs
|
thanks
|
|
agree |
writeaway
: and with Yvonne
12 hrs
|
thanks
|
|
agree |
Taña Dalglish
: Absolutely. Also totally disagree with Daryo assessment. One is under no obligation to include references (links) and the narratives are insane and uncalled for!
13 hrs
|
thanks
|
|
agree |
Edith Kelly
14 hrs
|
thanks
|
a chipmaker that manufactures(fabricates) semiconductors according to the designs of other companies
A business that operates a semiconductor fab for the purpose of fabricating the designs of other companies, such as fabless semiconductor companies, is known as a foundry. If a foundry does not also produce its own designs, it is known as a pure-play semiconductor foundry. If a foundry produces its own designs, it is known as an integrated device manufacturer (IDM).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semiconductor_fabrication_plan...
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 21 hrs (2020-09-13 21:35:47 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Unlike Intel, which designs and manufactures its own chips, TSMC only manufactures chips. With that narrow focus, TSMC has become the world’s largest and most advanced contract manufacturer for chipsets.
TSMC already does business with Apple; it manufactures iPhone and iPad chipsets.
https://fortune.com/2020/06/22/taiwan-semiconductors-apple-c...
agree |
Daryo
: you beat me to it / THAT is the key point
4 mins
|
Thank you!
|
|
agree |
Steve Wang
: This explanation is very good!
4 hrs
|
Thank you!
|
|
agree |
Althea Draper
10 hrs
|
Thank you!
|
they ONLY make the chips, they don't design them
Any kind of "supply" of anything is always done through some form of "contract" - so "contract chipmaker" can be at first a bit puzzling.
What is meant here is that this company is only making / manufacturing chips "on order" i.e. according to designs given by (known) clients (and these chips would be available ONLY for these "clients" - more accurately "commanditaires" who are in effect "commissioning" the production), as opposed to manufacturing chips designed by themselves for any future (yet unknown) client that could be interested.
If you want a parallel in the language business when you translate a text given by a client that you can only make available to that client it would be a "contract translation", as opposed to, say, you translating your own book from one language to another.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 15 hrs (2020-09-13 15:21:08 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
They also make chips they designed themselves - but the part of their production as "contract manufacturer" is where they make chips designed by the client.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 day 14 hrs (2020-09-14 14:39:47 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
ntel is the key supplier to manufacturers of personal computers (about 80% of all PCs have an Intel main processor) but it DOESN'T make Intel a "contract chipmaker" because they make chips of THEIR OWN design.
Anyone can buy an Intel processor, including anyone fancying a D-I-Y assembled PC.
as opposed to
(TSMC) is the world's largest contract chipmaker and a key supplier to Apple.
which means
Apple is designing the chips they need but they couldn't be bothered to make them - they pass the blueprints to TSMC which will make these chips according to Apple's design and sell them ONLY to Apple.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 day 14 hrs (2020-09-14 14:40:20 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Intel is the key supplier to ...
neutral |
philgoddard
: Kiet said this an hour ago.
1 hr
|
Believe it or not, I did notice that - I even agreed with Kiet // it's just "un exercice de style" - another explanation.
|
Discussion
https://www.smh.com.au/technology/glance-worlds-largest-cont...
is the shortest answer to the Asker's question - without meandering through the right forest but not noticing the right tree ...
For example, Samsung makes chips to its own designs for its own use. They also make chips for other companies i.e. they are under contract to these other companies to make chips for them. They have contract chip making production lines in which they produce chips solely for other companies but because, overall, Samsung makes chips for itself too, then it isn't classed as a contract chipmaker.
There are companies like TSMC, Global Foundries and UMC who only make chips for companies other than themselves. These are referred to as contract chipmakers.
The term seems to be used mainly in the context of comparing companies on financial terms
For references see https://www.smh.com.au/technology/glance-worlds-largest-cont...
https://www.barrons.com/articles/BL-TB-34125
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-samsung-electronics-found...
https://www.pcworld.com/article/228275/article.html