Glossary entry (derived from question below)
Spanish term or phrase:
ESTÁNDAR DE REAL MALICIA
English translation:
STANDARD OF ACTUAL MALICE
Added to glossary by
Jane Martin
Feb 17, 2021 17:16
3 yrs ago
16 viewers *
Spanish term
ESTÁNDAR DE REAL MALICIA
Spanish to English
Law/Patents
Law (general)
LITIGATION
LA PARTE ACTORA NO ACREDITÓ EL ESTÁNDAR DE REAL MALICIA POR PARTE DE MI REPRESENTADA.
Proposed translations
(English)
3 +3 | STANDARD OF ACTUAL MALICE | Jane Martin |
5 +1 | STANDARD OF ACTUAL MALICE / ACTUAL MALICE STANDARD | jmf |
2 | standard of manifest vexatiousness | Adrian MM. |
Change log
Mar 3, 2021 08:16: Jane Martin Created KOG entry
Proposed translations
+3
38 mins
Selected
STANDARD OF ACTUAL MALICE
Actual malice is the legal standard established by the Supreme Court for libel cases to determine when public officials or public figures may recover damages in lawsuits against the news media
https://mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/889/actual-malice#:...
https://mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/889/actual-malice#:...
Peer comment(s):
agree |
jmf
1 min
|
Thank you.
|
|
agree |
philgoddard
: Or definition.
5 mins
|
Thanks Phil
|
|
agree |
Z-Translations Translator
3 hrs
|
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "Selected automatically based on peer agreement."
+1
40 mins
STANDARD OF ACTUAL MALICE / ACTUAL MALICE STANDARD
References:
EXTENSION OF SULLIVAN'S ACTUAL MALICE ... - HeinOnlineheinonline.org › hol-cgi-bin › get_pdf › geolr2
standard of actual malice should include persons who are not public officials, but are public figures involved in issues of justified and important public interest.' 2.
Defamation: Extension of the Actual Malice Standard to ...scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu › cgi › viewcontent
by JR Bayer · 1983 · Related articles
complaint stated a cause of action, but disagreed with the majority's opinion that the New York Times standard of actual malice should apply. This highly critical ...
Constitutional Law -- Defamation under the First ... - COREcore.ac.uk › download › pdf
by JR Carpenter Jr · Cited by 4 · Related articles
standard of actual malice in Butts than that applied to public officials. By applying a different standard the Court may be doing what Mr. Justice Black describes ...
The U.S. Supreme Court should revisit its foundational rulings ...news.bloomberglaw.com › us-law-week › cosby-defam...
Feb 19, 2019 — The U.S. Supreme Court should revisit its foundational rulings on libel grounded in the standard of actual malice after turning away a request to ...
EXTENSION OF SULLIVAN'S ACTUAL MALICE ... - HeinOnlineheinonline.org › hol-cgi-bin › get_pdf › geolr2
standard of actual malice should include persons who are not public officials, but are public figures involved in issues of justified and important public interest.' 2.
Defamation: Extension of the Actual Malice Standard to ...scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu › cgi › viewcontent
by JR Bayer · 1983 · Related articles
complaint stated a cause of action, but disagreed with the majority's opinion that the New York Times standard of actual malice should apply. This highly critical ...
Constitutional Law -- Defamation under the First ... - COREcore.ac.uk › download › pdf
by JR Carpenter Jr · Cited by 4 · Related articles
standard of actual malice in Butts than that applied to public officials. By applying a different standard the Court may be doing what Mr. Justice Black describes ...
The U.S. Supreme Court should revisit its foundational rulings ...news.bloomberglaw.com › us-law-week › cosby-defam...
Feb 19, 2019 — The U.S. Supreme Court should revisit its foundational rulings on libel grounded in the standard of actual malice after turning away a request to ...
9 hrs
standard of manifest vexatiousness
There is no indication from the question, apart from being litigation possibly in a civil case, that this is one of defamation - libel or slander - POR PARTE DE MI REPRESENTADA: on my clients' part.
Example sentence:
Update on recent Tribunal decisions part 1: the evolving approach to vexatiousness and manifest unreasonableness
Reference:
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/22098
http://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2333&context=wlulr
Peer comment(s):
neutral |
philgoddard
: It is defamation. http://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctrina_de_la_real_malicia
3 hrs
|
So point to that fact in the question asked.
|
Discussion
Question marks, quote marks, XXX unnecessary capitalization XXX and anything else that would not be found in a dictionary, should not be entered.
https://www.proz.com/siterules/kudoz_general/1.4#1.4