Glossary entry

English term or phrase:

conspicuous by its absence

English answer:

evident/obvious/manifest absence / lack of

Added to glossary by Vaddy Peters
Oct 20, 2012 19:36
11 yrs ago
English term

conspicuous by its absence

English Other General / Conversation / Greetings / Letters
About two hours later I saw an excited crowd besieging the front of a drug store. In a desert where nothing happens this was manna; so I wedged my way inside. On an extemporized couch of empty boxes and chairs was stretched the mortal corporeality of Major Wentworth Caswell. A doctor was testing him for the immortal ingredient. His decision was that it was ---------------------conspicuous by its absence.

Thank you!
Change log

Oct 20, 2012 19:36: changed "Kudoz queue" from "In queue" to "Public"

Oct 26, 2012 08:19: Vaddy Peters Created KOG entry

Responses

21 mins
Selected

evident/obvious/manifest absence / lack of

.
Something went wrong...
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
3 mins

(It was highly obvious that) he didn't have "the immortal ingredient"

A sense of humor...
Something went wrong...
+7
4 mins

it called attention to itself by not being there

In other words, the man was obviously dead! The "immortal ingredient", his soul, was absent. It had left his body.
Peer comment(s):

agree katsy
7 mins
Thanks, Katsy!
agree Charles Davis : I think the meaning is more or less "glaringly absent". I've agreed with you here primarily because you explain that it means he was dead, which is really the point.
22 mins
Thanks, Charles! / Yes, that expresses it well!
agree PoveyTrans (X)
32 mins
Thanks, Simon!
agree Yvonne Gallagher
3 hrs
Thanks, gallagy2!
agree Suzan Hamer : Dictionary.com: "Glaringly obvious by the fact of not being there. For example, One agenda item concerning publicity is conspicuous by its absence. The idea is ancient; it was expressed by the Roman writer Tacitus..."
13 hrs
Thanks, Suzan!
agree Mel Willetts (X)
17 hrs
Thanks, Mel!
agree Nicole Y. Adams, M.A.
1 day 8 hrs
Thanks, Nicole!
Something went wrong...

Reference comments

16 hrs
Reference:

Tacitus, Ann. III.76

Suzan's comment has made me go and look up the source of this expression in Tacitus, one of my favourite authors. It is the very last sentence of Annals, Book III, and refers to the funeral of Junia Tertulla, wife of Cassius and sister of Brutus, in AD 22:

"viginti clarissimarum familiarum imagines antelatae sunt, Manlii, Quinctii aliaque eiusdem nobilitatis nomina. sed praefulgebant Cassius atque Brutus eo ipso quod effigies eorum non visebantur."

Michael Grant translates this as follows:

"The effigies of twenty highly distinguished families, Manlii, Quinctii, and others equally aristocratic, headed the procession. But Cassius and Brutus were the most gloriously conspicuous – precisely because their statues were not to be seen."

The irony is devastating: Cassius and Brutus had been "airbrushed" out of history, along with the republic. Tacitus has no equal for this kind of thing.
Note from asker:
Most likely he took it from here (Aw that Henry...)
Something went wrong...
Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search