Glossary entry (derived from question below)
English term or phrase:
number figures
English answer:
visual representations of numbers, objects representing numbers
English term
number figures
"Cognitive ---- Perceptual Speed & Speed of Closure ---- Processing Speed; This is a grouping of abilities defined as the ability to perform automatic mental tasks efficiently. Strength in this area indicates abilities in working quickly with number figures or finding patterns of information within other distracting information. People with strengths in this area would have capabilities in any job that involved quickly checking the accuracy of records and finding information."
I would appreciate your help.
Jun 5, 2014 16:10: luskie changed "Level" from "Non-PRO" to "PRO"
PRO (3): DLyons, B D Finch, luskie
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Responses
visual representations of numbers, objects representing numbers
"Some authors say that the child's arithmetic develops from direct perception of number figures and this means that it is necessary to study with number figures — wands, points, ones, twos. Others say that the child must be taught not with number figures where the numbers are always given in certain forms, but must rather be freed from them to pass more rapidly to mediated counting. W. Laj and other adherents of the method of number figures showed with many experiments that the child who carries out counting operations with the help of number figures, visual samples, master these operations much more quickly."
http://books.google.es/books?id=Wvy8rt0kzf0C&pg=PA152&lpg=PA...
Actually it seems to be used in this sense in the English translation of Frege's Basic Laws of Arithmetic:
http://books.google.es/books?id=ZxcbAgAAQBAJ&pg=RA1-PA126&lp...
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 hr (2014-06-05 11:32:01 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
In principle, it's a perfectly sensible term, actually, if you want to be precise. A number like two is something abstract, something that has "twoness". "2" is not a number, it's a figure: a representation, a symbol, if you like. But not just any figure: specifically a figure that represents a number. There are, of course, figures that represent things other than numbers. :) is a figure, representing goodwill, friendliness, etc. And there are other figures or symbols apart from digits that can represent numbers, potentially. "Number figure" would simply be a term for a figure (whether a digit or some other kind) that represents a number, and the text is referring to the ability to work quickly with such figures.
agree |
luskie
20 mins
|
Thanks, luskie :)
|
|
agree |
Veronika McLaren
2 hrs
|
Thanks, Veronika :)
|
|
agree |
Tina Vonhof (X)
: Here is an example: http://mentalcalculations.150m.com/mental_ability__test_1.ht...
3 hrs
|
Thanks, Tina :)
|
|
agree |
B D Finch
: Yes, it does make sense now. In fact, I still use patterns learned in infant school to count things with, to avoid counting one item at a time, but hadn't known they were "number figures".
4 hrs
|
Thanks, Barbara. I will not pretend I had ever heard this term before, and even in specialised texts it is quite rare.
|
|
agree |
Zsofia Koszegi-Nagy
4 hrs
|
Thanks, Zsofia!
|
Discussion
I think it is hazardous to assume that this is a clumsy mistake by someone who didn't know how to express their ideas properly. It is most probably a quite deliberate and precise usage.