Sep 5, 2020 14:37
3 yrs ago
17 viewers *
French term
découle la propriété :
French to English
Other
Mathematics & Statistics
Context:
Nous introduisons des variables q(t) qui représentent la fraction de temps d'application de chacun des vecteurs de commande ; pour chaque pas de temps (t-1; t).
De cette définition découle la propriété :
0 ; (t ) 1.
On peut alors exprimer la commande globale sur le réseau par :
Accepted this task thinking it was a patent an it turns out to be a paper on statistics and water management
To my way of thinking it reads as
from this definition we have the following:
Am I right or simply tired?
TIA Chris.
Nous introduisons des variables q(t) qui représentent la fraction de temps d'application de chacun des vecteurs de commande ; pour chaque pas de temps (t-1; t).
De cette définition découle la propriété :
0 ; (t ) 1.
On peut alors exprimer la commande globale sur le réseau par :
Accepted this task thinking it was a patent an it turns out to be a paper on statistics and water management
To my way of thinking it reads as
from this definition we have the following:
Am I right or simply tired?
TIA Chris.
Proposed translations
(English)
| 3 +1 | the (following) property is derived |
SafeTex
|
| 4 -2 | From this definition, it follows the property... |
Francois Boye
|
| 3 -1 | gives the property |
philgoddard
|
Change log
Sep 5, 2020 16:26: philgoddard changed "Field" from "Law/Patents" to "Other" , "Field (write-in)" from "Statistics" to "(none)"
Proposed translations
+1
11 hrs
Selected
the (following) property is derived
For maths, I think "derive" could be used.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 19 hrs (2020-09-06 09:51:53 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
or "obtained"
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 19 hrs (2020-09-06 09:51:53 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
or "obtained"
Example sentence:
from this definition, the (following) property is derived
Reference:
Note from asker:
| Do sometimes wonder why my questions provoke so much discussion. |
Peer comment(s):
| agree |
B D Finch
1 day 10 hrs
|
|
Thanks B D Finch
|
|
| disagree |
Francois Boye
: this is a literary expression. In Math books, they say from x it follows y.
1 day 20 hrs
|
|
So maths books are literary works now? HA HA HA
|
|
| agree |
Daryo
11 days
|
|
Thanks for the belated agree.
|
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "Thank you."
-2
12 hrs
Francois Boye
United States
United States
Native in French
Specializes in field
United States
An economic geek with social skills
Native in: French 
Works in: English to French, French to English, Spanish to English, and 1 more.
Related KudoZ points
:
13
From this definition, it follows the property...
My take
Peer comment(s):
| disagree |
B D Finch
: Syntax is quite wrong: makes no sense.//Probably primary school level maths books.
1 day 9 hrs
|
|
Incorrect! My translation is basic deduction in math books (from x it follows y)..
|
|
| disagree |
SafeTex
: How many native speakers does it take to convince you that your syntax is wrong plus the fact that an equation is not a definition despite the French.
1 day 21 hrs
|
-1
1 hr
philgoddard
United States
United States
Native in English
United States
Six languages into flawless English
Native in: English
Works in: German to English, French to English, Spanish to English, and 4 more.
Related KudoZ points
:
7
French term (edited):
découle la propriété
gives the property
This is not my area of expertise, but a literal translation seems reasonable.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 day 14 mins (2020-09-06 14:52:31 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
This gives the property ( CPA/I), and completes the proof.
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://...
This gives the property that (ab)m = (bc)n = (ca)l = 1 since l, m, n are integers. ≥ 2.
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://...
This gives the property (iv), since. X n U is target-dense in each open ...
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://...
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 day 14 mins (2020-09-06 14:52:31 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
This gives the property ( CPA/I), and completes the proof.
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://...
This gives the property that (ab)m = (bc)n = (ca)l = 1 since l, m, n are integers. ≥ 2.
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://...
This gives the property (iv), since. X n U is target-dense in each open ...
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://...
Peer comment(s):
| disagree |
Daryo
: as ou said yourself "This is not my area of expertise" // Sorry to burst your bubble, but as it happens mathematical logic is one of them.
2 hrs
|
|
It's not your area of expertise either, but that's never stopped you passing judgment on everyone.
|
|
| neutral |
SafeTex
: This is not my preferred solution but I don't think it deserved a disagree as we do say when calculating "... and this gives us... ". e.g "π r 2 gives us the area of a circle".
17 hrs
|
|
Thanks. My answer is perfectly correct, as my references show. I made the mistake of admitting I'm not a mathematician when the Disagreer in Chief was lurking. We all translate outside our areas of expertise every day, and make a good job of it.
|
|
| neutral |
B D Finch
: Not wrong, but "to derive" is the more suitable verb. // Because it states that the definition is the logical source from which property results. The verb "to give" is more suited to the result of a calculation. (I did stats units for 3 years at uni.)
1 day 20 hrs
|
|
Why?
|
Discussion
On the other hand a "consequence of this definition" is really weird, firstly because mathematical formulas are not "definitions" (despite the French) but "equations" and secondly, because "equations" do not normally have "consequences". We "derive" or obtain" results/properties from them.
Regards
"the consequence of this defintion is that ..."
the text says nothing about *what* is supposed to have the "property 0 ; (t ) 1." It's probably defined somewhere in the preceding text.