This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential to the operation of the site, while others help to improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used. For more information, please see the ProZ.com privacy policy.
Cookie settings
  1. KudoZ™ Top
  2. English to Turkish
  3. Law: Contract(s)

Commercial-in-confidence

Turkish translation: Gizli Bilgi

GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW)
English term or phrase:Commercial-in-confidence
Turkish translation:Gizli Bilgi
Entered by: Taner Göde

06:57 Nov 18, 2006
English to Turkish translations [PRO]
Bus/Financial - Law: Contract(s)
English term or phrase: Commercial-in-confidence
Türkçe'deki karşılığını arıyorum. Teşekkürler.
serdar_000
Local time: 00:46
(Kurumlar Arası) Gizli Bilgi
Explanation:
http://www.defence.gov.au/dmo/id/cic_contracts/cic_contracts...

Commercial-in-Confidence information
TOP
The Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines (January 2005) state that agencies should ‘consider, on a case-by-case basis, any request by a supplier for material to be treated confidentially’. The Defence Materiel Organisation term ‘commercial-in-confidence’ has the same meaning as ‘confidential information’ that is used frequently by Defence and other government agencies, parliament and the courts.
**********

http://www.newcrops.uq.edu.au/newslett/ncnl2-3.htm

3. Commercial-in-Confidence: handling confidential partnerships
Steve Martin
Manager, Horticulture and Export Development Branch
Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries Tasmania
The development of new crops and opportunities is a dynamic process. The methodology being adopted by the DPIFT has been developed as part of a concerted effort to capture a number of 'neglected', rather than strictly 'new', crop opportunities which have been identified as having good prospects for commercial success in Tasmania's temperate climate.

The criteria against which 'new' opportunities are being evaluated is proving to be very effective and already a number of prospects are looking very promising. Experience to date has shown that the key to success is the early involvement by individuals in the private sector who wish to share in the vision and are prepared to assist by contributing resources, including expertise and direct financial support.

The success of the approach is demonstrated by the level of commercial interest in the current program. The most public of these new associations is the relationship with Roberts Ltd, a major Tasmanian agricultural organisation which has joined in a partnership with the Department to assess the prospects for a Japanese green tea industry in Tasmania.

Such associations cannot be entered into lightly because, depending on the level of resources being offered, special conditions are often sought by the commercial partner aimed at providing them with a potential commercial advantage over their competitors.

This issue has now been addressed as part of the Department's 'new' crops program. In the past it has been argued that public sector funds should be used equitably and be available to all. The Department has now adopted a more pragmatic approach by acknowledging that for a commercial participant to be interested in participating in a major way they need to feel that there is a potential commercial benefit. If the participant cannot see any potential commercial benefit then any involvement that they have, or any contribution that they make, will be seen purely as a public relations activity with no commitment to the project.

The current approach with 'new' opportunities is to direct resources towards key participants in horticulture who have the resources to take an identified opportunity and develop it into a new industry. However, the establishment of such commercial partnerships creates new pressures for public sector organisations. Contributors generally want to establish some form of exclusivity which inevitably results in them wishing to actively exclude potential competitors.

To date, the DPIFT approach has been to limit the period of exclusivity or to establish guidelines to ensure that work undertaken as part of an arrangement cannot be 'mothballed' by a commercial partner for unreasonable periods of time should they not wish to continue with a project in which they have had a significant input.

In all cases, except where the work is 100% funded by a private organisation, the Department has adopted partnerships that will permit it to ultimately publish the outcomes of projects after an agreed period. In this way the Department believes that 'public good' ideals are being acknowledged.

The maintenance of any partnership requires a high level of trust beyond any formal legal agreements. Staff involved in projects may be required to sign confidentiality agreements aimed at ensuring that projects are not 'gossiped' about in inappropriate circumstances. Such gossip can easily undermine good corporate relationships.

While the Department's new crop program is still young we believe we have formed the basis of a workable arrangement with our private sector partners. They have also appreciated our position.

It seems essential for the public sector to adopt a long-term perspective and a more commercial approach if new opportunities are to be captured with the limited financial and human resources available.

We must acknowledge that the public sector will receive its dividends in the longer term from the increased economic activity generated by the efficient development of any new opportunities commercialised by our private sector partners.

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 21 mins (2006-11-18 07:18:49 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

Vay be, o kadar ProZ'laşmışız ki aynı anda ve aynı yerden açıklama bulup, cevap farklı da olsa, yayınlıyoruz.


Selected response from:

Taner Göde
Türkiye
Local time: 00:46
Grading comment
Teşekkür ederim.
4 KudoZ points were awarded for this answer



Summary of answers provided
5 +2ticari gizli bilgi
Serkan Doğan
5 +2(Kurumlar Arası) Gizli Bilgi
Taner Göde
5Gizlilik ama Avustralya ve Ingiltere'de kullanim farkliliklari var
Aysun Demir


  

Answers


15 mins   confidence: Answerer confidence 5/5 peer agreement (net): +2
commercial-in-confidence
ticari gizli bilgi


Explanation:
gizli ticari bilgi

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 17 mins (2006-11-18 07:15:01 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

The Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines (January 2005) state that agencies should ‘consider, on a case-by-case basis, any request by a supplier for material to be treated confidentially’. The Defence Materiel Organisation term ‘commercial-in-confidence’ has the same meaning as ‘confidential information’ that is used frequently by Defence and other government agencies, parliament and the courts.

Serkan Doğan
Türkiye
Local time: 00:46
Works in field
Native speaker of: Native in TurkishTurkish
PRO pts in category: 32

Peer comments on this answer (and responses from the answerer)
agree  Ebru Kopf
5 mins
  -> teşekkürler Ebru hn
agree  Ebru Güler
2 days 3 hrs
  ->  teşekkürler
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade)

19 mins   confidence: Answerer confidence 5/5 peer agreement (net): +2
commercial-in-confidence
(Kurumlar Arası) Gizli Bilgi


Explanation:
http://www.defence.gov.au/dmo/id/cic_contracts/cic_contracts...

Commercial-in-Confidence information
TOP
The Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines (January 2005) state that agencies should ‘consider, on a case-by-case basis, any request by a supplier for material to be treated confidentially’. The Defence Materiel Organisation term ‘commercial-in-confidence’ has the same meaning as ‘confidential information’ that is used frequently by Defence and other government agencies, parliament and the courts.
**********

http://www.newcrops.uq.edu.au/newslett/ncnl2-3.htm

3. Commercial-in-Confidence: handling confidential partnerships
Steve Martin
Manager, Horticulture and Export Development Branch
Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries Tasmania
The development of new crops and opportunities is a dynamic process. The methodology being adopted by the DPIFT has been developed as part of a concerted effort to capture a number of 'neglected', rather than strictly 'new', crop opportunities which have been identified as having good prospects for commercial success in Tasmania's temperate climate.

The criteria against which 'new' opportunities are being evaluated is proving to be very effective and already a number of prospects are looking very promising. Experience to date has shown that the key to success is the early involvement by individuals in the private sector who wish to share in the vision and are prepared to assist by contributing resources, including expertise and direct financial support.

The success of the approach is demonstrated by the level of commercial interest in the current program. The most public of these new associations is the relationship with Roberts Ltd, a major Tasmanian agricultural organisation which has joined in a partnership with the Department to assess the prospects for a Japanese green tea industry in Tasmania.

Such associations cannot be entered into lightly because, depending on the level of resources being offered, special conditions are often sought by the commercial partner aimed at providing them with a potential commercial advantage over their competitors.

This issue has now been addressed as part of the Department's 'new' crops program. In the past it has been argued that public sector funds should be used equitably and be available to all. The Department has now adopted a more pragmatic approach by acknowledging that for a commercial participant to be interested in participating in a major way they need to feel that there is a potential commercial benefit. If the participant cannot see any potential commercial benefit then any involvement that they have, or any contribution that they make, will be seen purely as a public relations activity with no commitment to the project.

The current approach with 'new' opportunities is to direct resources towards key participants in horticulture who have the resources to take an identified opportunity and develop it into a new industry. However, the establishment of such commercial partnerships creates new pressures for public sector organisations. Contributors generally want to establish some form of exclusivity which inevitably results in them wishing to actively exclude potential competitors.

To date, the DPIFT approach has been to limit the period of exclusivity or to establish guidelines to ensure that work undertaken as part of an arrangement cannot be 'mothballed' by a commercial partner for unreasonable periods of time should they not wish to continue with a project in which they have had a significant input.

In all cases, except where the work is 100% funded by a private organisation, the Department has adopted partnerships that will permit it to ultimately publish the outcomes of projects after an agreed period. In this way the Department believes that 'public good' ideals are being acknowledged.

The maintenance of any partnership requires a high level of trust beyond any formal legal agreements. Staff involved in projects may be required to sign confidentiality agreements aimed at ensuring that projects are not 'gossiped' about in inappropriate circumstances. Such gossip can easily undermine good corporate relationships.

While the Department's new crop program is still young we believe we have formed the basis of a workable arrangement with our private sector partners. They have also appreciated our position.

It seems essential for the public sector to adopt a long-term perspective and a more commercial approach if new opportunities are to be captured with the limited financial and human resources available.

We must acknowledge that the public sector will receive its dividends in the longer term from the increased economic activity generated by the efficient development of any new opportunities commercialised by our private sector partners.

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 21 mins (2006-11-18 07:18:49 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

Vay be, o kadar ProZ'laşmışız ki aynı anda ve aynı yerden açıklama bulup, cevap farklı da olsa, yayınlıyoruz.





    Reference: http://www.google.com.tr/search?hl=tr&q=commercial-in-confid...
Taner Göde
Türkiye
Local time: 00:46
Works in field
Native speaker of: Native in TurkishTurkish
PRO pts in category: 56
Grading comment
Teşekkür ederim.

Peer comments on this answer (and responses from the answerer)
agree  Ebru Kopf
2 mins
  -> Çok teşekkür ederim Ebru Hanım.
agree  Guetta
4 days
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade)

14 hrs   confidence: Answerer confidence 5/5
commercial-in-confidence
Gizlilik ama Avustralya ve Ingiltere'de kullanim farkliliklari var


Explanation:
Ulkeden ulkeye ufak farkliliklari olabiliyor, dolayisiyla ceviriyi neresi icin yaptiginiza bagli...
Umarim asagidaki metin yardimci olur. Ama evet genel olarak "Gizlilik" anlasmasindan bahsediyor. Kolay gelsin.

"The British Ministry of Defence (MOD) advised that if it is only marked 'Commercial in Confidence' or 'Commercial', without 'Restricted', it is unclassified. It is a privacy marking. Program documentation should include procedures on handling sensitive but unclassified information.
UK material marked "Restricted -Commercial" or Restricted [anything else] should be treated in exactly the same way as straightforward UK Restricted material. The "Commercial" marking is a descriptor to identify the type or content of the information. If it has Restricted in the marking than it is classified.

The government of Australia also uses the marking "Commercial-in-Confidence." It is a privacy marking used for "commercial information which may be prejudiced by unauthorized disclosure." It is to be protected in a manner similar to RESTRICTED information, although a security clearance is not required for access to this type of information.

Electronic transmission of Commercial-in-Confidence information requires commercial grade encryption which has been approved by the relevant national communications security authority; with the exception of transmission by facsimile which may be conducted without encryption provided that arrangements are made for the recipient to attend the receiving facsimile machine at the time of transmission/reception. Transmission by mail/courier does not require government-to-government procedures.



    Reference: http://www.dss.mil/international/faqs.htm
Aysun Demir
United Kingdom
Works in field
Native speaker of: Turkish
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade)



Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.

You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.

Return to KudoZ list

KudoZ™ translation help

The KudoZ network provides a framework for translators and others to assist each other with translations or explanations of terms and short phrases.

See also:
ProZ.com term search
Search millions of term translations
Close search
Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search