I've looked at the 3 recommended links. Also have one from
http://www.wi-fiplanet.com/columns/article.php/1135751 (When the FCC Knocks on Your Door, by Jim Wagner), saying:
"The process for Part-15 compliance is confusing. In fact, one could go so far as to say that the FCC rules governing Wi-Fi systems are overly restrictive and unyielding in their failure to allow for compromise.
The FCC's top officials, engineers, and inspectors seem to be in agreement�although they won't go on the record as saying so."
The first link Gayle gives (a government source) says this:
"Note: To be considered harmful interference, the interference must cause serious detrimental effects, such as circuit outages and message losses, as opposed to interference that is merely a nuisance or annoyance that can be overcome by appropriate measures."
AND in the FCC Part 15 text which I've quoted, the regulation itself definitely describes 4 appropriate measures, which are all rather banal. The warning also seems to have a lot to do with the installation in accordance with the instructions - the emission could be harmful if not done properly.
This is why I think "harmful" could possibly be replaced by "disturbing" - without jeopardizing FCC approval.
The text is part of "Instructions for Use" addressed to elderly/bedridden. Seems like the prescribed warning is too high-geared in this case. ;-) I'm not asking for you to approve, but mainly wonder if anyone has experience with writing these label warnings - and knows how strict the wording HAS to be?
At any rate, thank you for the information. Will be back later.