Suggestion.

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 10 mins (2010-11-14 14:50:34 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

non-employees is also possible.

temp workerS could be; independent contractors/consultants etc. depends on context

It is just an option not to use twice "temp workers"

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 37 min (2010-11-14 15:17:19 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------


Link
http://www.wordreference.com/iten/interim

atypical work contracts, atypical workers and similar are being used more and more, at least in the european union
(google it)

see this link where this subject is being discussed.
http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/areas/industrialrelations/dic...

in fact, in some way, language is adapting to new situations

atypical workers are not just the temporary workers,
temporary work - it may be for eg. contratto a tempo determinato - a "lavoratore subordinato"
whereas the contratti atipici typically lack this aspect of "subordinazione"

‘Permanent employees and members of [insert however you have translated the word ‘personale’ that appears before the colon] who are other than permanent employees’

Takes into account what you say in your comment to potra. I’m not convinced that the draughtsman specifically meant to exclude ‘personale temporaneo’ from the category of ‘dipendenti o non’. My interpretation is that 'non' means anyone involved who isn't a permanent employee, despite the attempt at a catch all list that follows, which is not exhaustive from what I can see.


I’m not sure I’d feel safe actually defining the ‘non’ bit with a specific term that was anything tighter and could be inappropriately exclusive.

My suggestion is a bit ungainly, admittedly, but is dafe, I'd like to think.

My only other thought is this: are we sure that 'dipendenti' doesn’t refer specifically to the 'incaricati', ie could it also read ‘incaricati, dipendenti o non, compresi coloro che lavorano a domicilio….’ For example, we often see:

‘……..per le medesime finalità i dati potranno venire a conoscenza delle seguenti categorie di incaricati: dipendenti e collaboratori dell'azienda, ...etc etc”

– ie ‘dipendenti’ and incaricati’ aren’t mutually exclusive Don’t want to unnecessarily muddy the waters, but it may be worth checking that this possibility can be ruled out.

I've been mulling this one over and I decided to take down my previous answer of "permanent and temporary personnel" because I feel this post is better in the context.

The problem is the heavily loaded connotations of the word "dipendente" in Italian, which for years was "permanent" and "a tempo indeterminato" (a place for life - only recently has an "a tempo determinato" clause been introduced to Italian law). For example a "dipendente occasionale" would seem to be a contradiction of terms in Italian, while a "casual employee" is a standard term in English.

http://www.google.com/search?source=ig&hl=en&rlz=&=&q="casua...

http://www.google.it/search?hl=en&q="dipendente occasionale"...

I think in the context, "directly and indirectly employed" covers the full range of all the personnel for which the "employer" is liable, i.e. all those working on his behalf in some way.