GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
09:17 May 11, 2017 |
English language (monolingual) [PRO] General / Conversation / Greetings / Letters / science, quantistic | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Charles Davis Spain Local time: 08:18 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
SUMMARY OF ALL EXPLANATIONS PROVIDED | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 +10 | not content with having put forward these heretical ideas, he has even more to propose |
|
Discussion entries: 1 | |
---|---|
not content with having put forward these heretical ideas, he has even more to propose Explanation: In other words, his heretical ideas extend even further than what has just been outlined. "Heresy" here, of course, means something that conflicts with official scientific doctrine, just as religious heresy conflicts with official religious doctrine. "Unorthodoxy" would be close in meaning, though "heresy" implies something ideas that are radically opposed to mainstream thinking to the point of possibly being considered dangerous; if they are right, current ideas will have to fundamentally revised. So putting forward scientific heresy is a professionally hazardous thing to do; you will be vilified and people will be anxious to reject what you say. "That is not quite enough" implies that he is not satisfied; he has a bit more heresy to propose. Discarding experimental results that you don’t want is absolutely contrary to normal scientific thinking and practice. "Not quite" implies that what has been said is already very radical, and that going even further is surprising. |
| |